Tuesday, June 3, 2008

McCavitt: Potential liability forever

You can read about the special city council meeting in the Daily News story here. Stephen Tait did a really nice job covering the meeting. Here's some other stuff that isn't in the story.

Ward 1 City Councillor Larry McCavitt perhaps said it best when he said we could have "goop and crap" floating downstream from the landfill forever, which also could cause liability.

I have to say, I was shocked to learn that councillors had not heard about the depositions to which some residents who live near the landfill were subjected by New Ventures in the company's attempt to dispute its liability over the effects of hydrogen sulfide leaking from the landfill. If I'm not mistaken, it was in the Daily News.

Residents were grilled and raked over the coals for good measure, they say, by NV attorneys. Brenda Reffett spoke of this at the meeting, and this seems to have been what most outraged Tom O'Brien.

"I'm like that guy in the movie," he said. "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!"

One thing should have struck the council - when Tom Jones (councillor-at-large) said that there's a reason New Ventures is an LLC. "From day one, the intent of this entity was to limit its liability. It's the end of its useful life when profiting ceases ... The only constant is Newburyport."
Jones said he would "acquiesce" to the majority on whether to take a vote right then. His wife is on the ad hoc landfill advisory committee so I guess he kind of had to say that. He also invoked the name of former British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who believed that being 'nice' to the Nazis pre-World War II was a good move.

Greg Earls, who sits next to Jones, said nothing. I already reported what Donna Holaday said. Steve Hutcheson said nothing. Tom O'Brien, as I said, was incensed and wanted to vote then and there. I already reported what Ed Cameron and Katie Ives said. Barry Connell said nothing, but before the meeting re-opened to the public, he said privately he had had a root canal that day. I already reported what Brian Derrivan said.

Derrivan seems like a pleasant enough guy, but I've too many times seen him and the mayor with their heads together (literally), in the shadowy parts of City Hall, before a City Council meeting.

McCavitt, my councillor (as in, I live in Ward 1), said a lot more. He doubts the structural integrity of the landfill ("I don't believe it's possible to even make this secure.") But he also said he needed to "look this over for the next week or so."

I just keep thinking about what Katie Ives said about doing what's best for all of Newburyport and how it was only fair to give the council enough time to consider the options. They haven't had time to consider how loathsome New Ventures is?

Is giving in to threats and selling out a whole neighborhood for money what's best for Newburyport? Someone after the meeting suggested to me that maybe we can pawn the landfill ... I mean offer the landfill to Stephen Karp. As I said before, Newburyport can ski ... and he loves it here sooooo much.

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

Um...For what money are they selling out ?

Gillian Swart said...

I'm speculating ... Well, according to Ron Klodenski and I believe the Daily, the deal involves "cash considerations." Or maybe that was the asphalt grindings deal. Who knows? The new deal is a secret. I'm taking O'Connor Ives' comment about doing what's best for the whole city as an indication that there's money involved. And the fact that it's the owner's modus operendi (not sure how that's spelled!) to offer up sums of cash to buy off the communities he operates in. If I'm wrong, then someone who knows what the deal is can correct me. In my dreams. This is my point.

Anonymous said...

Oh my, another "shiny trinket" sell out....

"Newburyport - you can have your way with us for cash considerations"....

Newbury starting to look better now ?

Gillian Swart said...

Didn't you say you live in Newburyport???

Anonymous said...

Yes, I do reside in Newburyport - I was simply commenting that things are pretty rotten here in some ways and that perhaps Newbury doesn't look as bad to you now.

And while I agree that there are likely financial considerations involved, I think those considerations are more a result of liability and legal costs than revenue opportunities.

Gillian Swart said...

Well I just got an email from one of the ad hoc landfill advisory committee and s/he is behind the City Council taking its time on this matter.

You're probably right about the considerations, but I don't know why it has to be such a big secret.

The City Council at least appears to be operating in a vacuum, much like poor Brendan O'Regan trying to figure out how much water the city will need 10 years from now.

Ten years from now, we could have no water to put out the fires on the landfill.

But we will have a hotel.

Gillian Swart said...

Oh ... and one small town is pretty much the same as the other. This one just has more people making the policy than the other. Ten always trumps three.

Anonymous said...

Well, I think 3 is to be 5 and we're more than twice their size. I also believe we have 11 (12 counting the mayor).

What do you have against a hotel or would you prefer more condos ???

Gillian Swart said...

I would prefer nothing. As in, I moved here because I like it the way it is. Well, except for the lack of racial diversity, that is. I mean, I like the way it looks and feels.

I think a hotel would be ill-advised and I think Karp must at least partly think so as well.

I would, however, prefer a hotel to more condos. Either way, it's more upscale white people moving into town and taking away what appealed to me about this city.

Like what happened in Boston.

Anonymous said...

Didn't you argue in an earlier post that you favored gentrification ? I think the upscale white people were already here when you arrived.
I think Karp is concerned that a hotel will take up too much of his rather limited space and cut into his profits. I'd like WF to remain undeveloped - just as I wish PI were undeveloped - but as they say in Newbury - the horse is already out of the barn.

Gillian Swart said...

Not me, man.

Don't get me wrong, some of my great pals are probably what one would consider 'upscale white people.' They just have a more satisfactory outlook on things, from my viewpoint. Or else they would not be my friends.

yeah, the horse is long gone.

Anonymous said...

Gillian,

It looks like I selectively remembered one of your posts...my bad.

"...Well, folks, this round of newcomers (with a few exceptions, like me) wants the city to be gentrified..."

At least the housing market will slow the flow of upscale white people - in the short term anyway.

Any follow-up stories to your adventure at The PIG ?

Tom Salemi said...

Um, we WANT the city to be gentrified? Have you looked around?

It's not like Karp owns and would be cleaning up The Bowery. It's where people store their boats and yachts!

And it's actually one of my favorite parts of the city, but still, let's get real here.

I know, off topic.

Gillian Swart said...

Tom,

Guess I should have said "further gentrified" or something along those lines. Did you read happen to read the whole post, in context? Plus, I did say the horse was long gone (out of the barn) on that issue.

Tom Salemi said...

Why would I do a silly thing like that? Who cares about context!!?

Just funning.

Gillian Swart said...

Ah, Tom, I knew you were a kindred spirit.