Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Council tables regionalized health deal (again)

As reported in the Daily News today, the City Council once again tabled a vote on the shared health services agreement.

This is about as weird as it gets.

Well, actually, no it isn't but it sounded good, didn't it?

Salisbury has already approved the agreement and then Amesbury goes ahead and changes it? I notice nobody said last night what the changes were ... Donna Holaday only said they were "clarification changes."

What is the legality of changing an agreement, however minor the changes, that Salisbury has already voted to adopt?

No comments: